![]() The entire tank is smaller than the hull of an M60. Low profile and very small made it very difficult to hit. Ditches had to be crossed diagonally, and the dozer blade attached to all tanks in the C version was there to smoothen ditch sides. I could write an essay on this topic, but for now I'll just point out a few things: However, by all accounts, a piece of crap?Very short: No.Ī bit more elaborated: It did have a few disadvantages, but overall performance was comparable to it's competitors M60, Cheftain, Leopard. It was interesting to see it at Bovington, very low and strange looking. The latest versions of ATG carriers are in English terms usually designated as light tanks, but is nothing but TDs. There are several examples of light vehicles, armoured as well as unarmoured, fitted with ATGs or ATGMs. ![]() Tank destroyers, defined as ground vehicles that are cheaper than MBTs and designed with the main/only purpose of defeating enemy armour, have been in use continously since WW2. Home of „Die Sturmgruppe“ Scenario Design Group for Combat Mission. They went racing cars with it on the Autobahn. I have just read a website by a German TD Coy that was disbanded in 1996 and sported the Jaguar with top-mounted somefinks.Ī friend told me that the Jaguar was also used as OP tank after the gun was removed. It looked pretty much like the Jgdpz.IV, had a 90mm gun, and later a top-mounted TOW (mefinks). ![]() (Don't ask me to explain, I could not, I just quote what the people there said). The 'S' tank, according to Bovington, was actually an MBT, but is often mistaken for a TD. I have forgotten its name though have to look it up. ![]() The German army had used a Tank destroyer to. After the war the Hetzer stayed in service with the Austrian army well into the 60's. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |